I have a very complicated history and relationship with labels.
Started in childhood, chugging along strongly through adulthood.
I need labels because they help me understand the baseline expectations. I say base line, because like with many other things, people change their definition of a word/label, so conversations should still occur. Though I’ve noticed people like to skip that step and just assume everyone uses the label in the same way they do.
I digress.
I struggle with labels because they feel confining. Though often there isn’t a right word because people and situations are complicated and none of them are the same even when using the same labels.
There’s much more I can say on that, but I lack the focus. I feel that might be apparent.
I am going to briefly mention my metamour and because I don’t know how I feel about that label at the moment, I did settle on a nom de blog. Sticking with Jane Eyre, we’ll use Blanche.
Saying that things have been difficult there would be an understatement. More recently (in the last few months) it has become even more emotionally taxing. At first I was hoping there would be maybe some healing or at least understanding. Then I was hoping that we could find the common ground of both caring for Rochester and wishing to make his life less difficult.
Now, I suspect my trauma has been correct. But not much I can do about it.
Blanche and I have been exchanging messages on a chat/social media app. Mostly has not been going well. I have three people from my circle that I have been asking for some help in proofreading, reality checks, and overall support.
Teapot has also been included on most of the exchange, as it has been triggering my trauma and anxiety pretty hard.
I’ve actually been making an attempt far past where my circle and Teapot told me to go, and are still encouraging me to put it down.
After a clarification with Rochester, and depending on if/what Blanche messages next will likely determine things.
Definitely gives too many chances.
Anyway, I had suggested that the vee (her, Rochester, and I) should see a relationship coach to work through some of the communication issues and values misalignment.
Naturally that blew up in my face and reinforced some beliefs. Then Blanche seemed to consider going just the two of us to start. I sent her the info for the coach I had been asking questions of and had setup an agreeable contract.
Blanche gets …concerned, that the relationship coach currently identifies as a relationship anarchist. So Blanche then starts to question me on my identity and labels (noting for future me, remember that Teapot was not thrilled about this interaction and change of focus on my labels/identity).
At the time the question happened, I didn’t have the space or ability. In a day or two I responded as best I could. Because identity is complicated and nuanced and I have had to deal with my identity constantly shifting for the last 5 years as I went through break ups, a divorce, losing my job, the pandemic, and all my new labeled diagnosis.
I wrote an essay basically, but no one who actually knows me would be surprised by this.
I just felt like putting out into the world, my current view on who I try to be when it comes to ethical non monogamy, my values, and what I look for in my connections.
Would also like to note to future self, it has now been 6 days without an acknowledgment or reply. Let’s see if Blanche breaks the 12 day record.
Onto the essay! That I didn’t really proof read or edit. Good luck!
What does ENM mean to me?
Over simplified summary:
For me ENM is about autonomy, informed consent, and working towards a place of co-existence and fairness.
Full answer:
I’ll preface with saying that I have a complicated relationship with labels, especially in the last 5-10 years as I’ve been working through different things. Which makes this not an easy thing to answer and why I needed some more time to work through some thoughts.
I also find that while they can be useful in certain instances, they are not in others. Everyone has their own version of what something means which can lead to misunderstandings or expectations that aren’t communicated properly that then result in unnecessary conflict. Some things are just difficult to label in general.
I have experienced and been involved in several different relationship configurations. In general, I would probably more closely identify as ambiamorous. Partially due to identifying somewhere on the demi scale both sexually and romantically. My first and most of my experiences with relationships have been/are a form of poly or ENM. I have been in periods of monogamy, or full on monogamous relationships. The full mono relationships did not end up being healthy for me for various reasons. ENM/poly have been more positive, though not all. Since connections tend to be sparse for me, I appreciate and need the freedom of exploring those if/when they should occur is what it comes down to, and I want my partner(s) to be afforded the same.
There are many things about the polyamorous community that I don’t agree with, and do not align with my personal morals at this point in my life and healing. I’ll say poly as short hand when needed in certain situations, but I don’t personally identify that way anymore. Sometimes it just takes too long to get into nuances at a social gathering. I don’t demonize anyone’s preferences in poly/ENM styles. I do expect people to be up front about their relationship structure, so I can ask more questions and then make the best decisions for myself.
I have started reading about relationship anarchy, and other ways ethical non monogamy is practiced, but I don’t identify as a relationship anarchist. There’s things within that identity that also do not align for me at this point or ignores circumstances. I believe it’s important to continue to educate myself and hear different perspectives or ways of doing things. I have found it a very rare thing for anyone in this community to have stuck to a single style the entire time.
Overall, when it comes to being ethically non monogamous I try to stick to certain values and morales more than anything else.
I don’t get involved with don’t ask/don’t tell relationships. If that works for someone, that’s fine, but personally I think it can lead to unnecessary conflict and hardships, and would rather avoid it.
Whenever possible I attempt to work towards “kitchen table poly” or “garden party poly”. I still believe using labels like that need to have actual conversations of what that means to everyone and not make assumptions that everyone is meaning the same thing.
I believe in autonomy and informed consent. I have preferences with partners, and I have boundaries. I believe “rules” can become very toxic, very quickly. I have experienced that in more than one relationship and have seen it destroy people I care about in others. I don’t believe in restricting the interactions and relationships of others, and I don’t believe people should try to enforce that on me.
I believe everyone is a human being and should be treated with common decency. That attempting to be kind and understanding and working on compromises can result in better connections and overall experiences. Consideration and care towards everyone involved is important to me.
I also think everyone involved should be aware of what power imbalances/privileges are in their different configurations and do their best to not weaponize those things. Paraphrasing a friend, “Hierarchy is endemic to most relationships, but any ethical look at any sort of hierarchy means being willing to investigate your preferences and being honest with yourself, your partners, and other members of the polycule. Not interrogating your own preferences could end up enforcing extremely unfair situations on people, or failing to manage some imbalance in desire between you and them”.
Again, people need to be people. I understand that nothing will ever truly be equal. No matter what anything looks like. Even in cases of if everyone was just “solo poly”, true equality is pretty impossible. I think it’s important for everyone to strive for fairness and negotiate what that means. Different relationships have different connections and different needs.
Related to that, double standards should be minimized as much as possible, though in my opinion, in an ideal world, shouldn’t exist. An example: if someone expects that when they are on a date with a partner, phones should be put away and texting other partners should not be happening. Then they should be affording the same courtesy/respect in the other direction. Which someone only knows about when it is talked about. Because not everyone has the same expectations or needs something like that.
I hope it’s a universal understanding that emergencies are going to happen, people are going to be going through different things in their life at different times or some times at the same time, some will be more extroverted/introverted, etc. That should all be taken into consideration on a regular basis. We’re all going to need different levels of support at different times.
If there is a reason that something in particular is special and someone would like it to remain that way, that’s understandable, and once again, should be a conversation and allow informed consent. I don’t believe anything is an actual inherent right to anyone or should be a default practice. I don’t think there is anything wrong with people wanting the same things and for multiple people to be able to experience it too. I do have issues if someone tries to make it an explicit rule that one person always gets to experience something first. That’s leaning towards toxic again. Or one person has to be able to do everything the other person does, but then tries to restrict it in the opposite direction. I believe it is completely reasonable for open poly/ENM people to share or trade off on events, holidays, etc. One of my previous polycules has a system that seems very fair and healthy in that regards.
When a relationship configuration changes (ie new partners, fwb becoming romantic, etc) or evolves in one way or another, there should be discussions instead of assumptions of preferences and values. Up front break downs of the dynamic(s) for someone new. Discussions in general of capability, expectations, needs, and interactions preferred with other polycule members.
I don’t believe in viewing or treating anyone as less than anyone else. I question anyone who says they’re ENM/poly, and have that as part of their dynamics. I have empathy and understanding for insecurities, I have them too. They shouldn’t be used to actively harm others or restrict relationships. That starts to go towards the toxic monogamy mindset for me.
I will afford as much respect and kindness as I am also receiving. I don’t think anyone should be forced to have connections with other members of the polycule, but in general should be open to seeing what that person is about and giving interactions a chance. I try to default to the thinking that if I like my partner, and my partner likes this other person, there’s probably going to be good things about them that I will like too.
Ultimately, I don’t believe that anyone has the right to make decisions for others. That everyone is responsible for their own boundaries and expressing their needs or wants. No relationship, no matter how anyone identifies, is going to look exactly like another relationship even when using the same labels. Because people and circumstances are different, and that should be respected.